Back Forum Reply New

Resolution, which type of artifacts do you prefer?

Here is the story.  I encode a ton of anime at high quality (3 eps/700 meg cd), and at this high bitrate almost everyone uses a res of 512x384.  The thing is, even though you loose a ton of detail by moving down to 448x336, the encode is almost pixel perfect.  Am I the only one who prefers less detail, but pixel perfect encodes, over more, but artifaced, detail?
    -Chu

You consider 512 a high resolution??? What's the original resolution then?

If you are capturing from a TV source you should stick to that resolution (400-something?) and not upsize to 512, but if the source is DVD you're already loosing a lot by going down to 512.

To answer you question, I'd prefer more artifacts and more detail over less artifacts and less detail. Artifacts can be cleaned up with post-processing, detail is lost forever.

I usually prefer lower resolutions over artefacts (well, depends on how much artefacts we are talking about), but I do all I can to stay above a 512x384 resolution. Below that, I find the picture loses too much detail.

--gt; Better use a little more filtering and stay at 512x384 without artefacts

You get as many artifacts at one resolution as you do at the other... and yes 512x384 is a fairly large resolution:

512 x 384 = 1.96x10^5 pixels  4:3
640 x 480 = 3.07x10^5 pixels  4:3  lt;- nobody uses this its too high
640 x 272 = 1.74x10^5 pixels  2.35:1
640 x 345 = 2.20x10^5 pixels  16:9

For normal DivX movie resolutions, its in between the two aspect ratio's in surface area.  512x384 is the perfect resolution for a 233mb episode which will be normally encoded at around 1000-1100 producing of course very high quality.  no one encodes an episode at 640x480 because its a freaking lot of pixels almost 3/2 more than the highest normal resolution DivX movie.  Anyway.. that's my 2 cents.
¥
Back Forum Reply New